Jump to content
SAU Community

Thinking Of Going Back To Twins


Recommended Posts

Currently my setup is as follows:

RB26 - standard bottom end

Tomei type b cams

3inch exhaust

GT3582R 19psi

and all the other bits and pieces to go with it

Now i made 510rwhp, my tuner took the torque figure because he sais it was pretty useless.

From others graphs Ive seen with the same turbo the torque has been around the 500 mark.

My question is, if i change back to say -5's and put my car on e85 will i make the same power but heaps more torque?

Most -5 setups Ive been seeing are all 700+ with some making just over 1000 with around the same 500hp figure

And then have the other obvious advantages like legality.

The car is a street car but I would like to get into a track day here and there and would really just like to get the most out of it.

No point having the high mount single when i could have better results with the twins and still look legal under the bonnet.

Am i on the right track?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go do a few track days without changing anything.

The car will have far more speed than you can extract out of yourself.

+1.

I never realised how much my car outperformed my driving skills on a track until I actually got out and started doing laps. No point making upgrades if you are the weakest link.

As for going back to twins, I would keep the GT35R you have on there now unless you're seriously concerned about copping a defect. The difference between -5s and a GT35R would be very minimal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+1.

I never realised how much my car outperformed my driving skills on a track until I actually got out and started doing laps. No point making upgrades if you are the weakest link.

As for going back to twins, I would keep the GT35R you have on there now unless you're seriously concerned about copping a defect. The difference between -5s and a GT35R would be very minimal.

Or if you are concerned about your result swap it out for a HTA3582 or GTX3582 and lean on it and you will make more than you could ever need...

But as the other guys said, its just a number... The car by rights should be bloody quick as it is so there is no point spending all that time and money going back to low mounts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i just want to mention that reading torque from a dyno graph is absolutely useless unless it's an engine dyno.

don't compare your torque figures to other peoples, it doesn't make sense to do so.

torque changes with leverage so using a different gear or even different size wheels will yield a different result. It is also possible to get much more torque at the wheels than at the engine (unlike power). so forget about it!

if you really want to upgrade your turbo look at what Matt said. My choice would be the HTA3582. It will be more responsive and have more top end than your current turbo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it running "only" 19psi? The torque figure is largely going to be from the engine VE and boost level, all other things being equal. If you have a good exhaust manifold and tune then psi for psi the GT35R should be more or less capable of matching or bettering your typical -5 setup - at least until you start maxing it out (-5s probably have a slight peak flow potential).

Sorting out the tune and raising the boost should see more to be had, any lack of torque isn't indicative of that turbo's potential - especially at that boost level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i just want to mention that reading torque from a dyno graph is absolutely useless unless it's an engine dyno.

don't compare your torque figures to other peoples, it doesn't make sense to do so.

torque changes with leverage so using a different gear or even different size wheels will yield a different result. It is also possible to get much more torque at the wheels than at the engine (unlike power). so forget about it!

if you really want to upgrade your turbo look at what Matt said. My choice would be the HTA3582. It will be more responsive and have more top end than your current turbo

+1

Torque figures on a standard dyno is meaningless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have plenty of meaning, that is how they tune for maximum best torque. As long as no variables are changed then torque output is a critical component of seeing the performance gains of mods.

Of course comparing torque figures between dyno's is gayer than comparing dicks.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have plenty of meaning, that is how they tune for maximum best torque. As long as no variables are changed then torque output is a critical component of seeing the performance gains of mods.

Of course comparing torque figures between dyno's is gayer than comparing dicks.

yes of course but the numbers are arbitrary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've been running a 525 for years with the standard hat and FPR in the stagea (mine has a 32 gtr fuel rail and stagea and 32 hat and tank setup are the same) without an issue with base fuel pressure. You said when you disconnected the return it is OK, did you do so at the fuel rail or the fuel hat? Either way I'd be looking for blockages or in the case of the tank kinks in the lines downstream Note I did however have an issue with the current required for the 460 melting the fuel hat.
    • I'm trying to maintain stock appearance . Hicas is still installed (although has lockout kit) did you retain factory fuel pump hat? If so I assume you used a bulkhead fitting or similar ?  I was also trying to avoid a full re design as it was previously dynoed at 426kw atw with same setup but different pump. Changing return line would also mean having to change ethanol sensor and fpr and possibly fuel rail. Not chasing more power in any way just reliability of the setup 
    • I do think it's weird I had it for 2 weeks then the issue came up out of nowhere and progressively got worse. I would've imagined changing everything in the ignition system would've resolved any ignition related misfires but still has the high rpm and idle misfires that seem unchanged. I would've thought if it was fuel related it would happen all the time unless it's the pump losing pressure when it gets hot. If it was the ecu I would think it would do it all of the time.  Something I noticed when I had it all apart was a pretty decent coating of oil in the J pipe coming from the throttle body. The weird thing about that is the pcv that goes to the intake is blocked off. So that has me wondering if the oil is coming from the turbo because that's the only thing that could get oil in there. This thing does sound like it spools like a mofo like I'm a former dsm guy and the only stock turbo I've ever heard spool this loud (to only go up to about 5psi) is on a diesel truck. And the recirculated bov is really loud too I had a TurboXS RFL and this thing is just as loud and being so low on psi seems a little weird. I don't know if any of this is or isn't related but just trying to make sure I'm not leaving any potentially helpful information out. 
    • So latest update. I replaced the ignitor with a jspec unit from enjuku. It felt a lot better at first although it is a little bit cooler of a day than it has been. Warming up didn't have as much misfire sputtering as before. Went on a 10m test drive. Felt good, a lot stronger though I was taking it easy on the boost. On the return trip started getting the cutting out at higher rpm again and was getting worse the longer I was driving. Took it easy the rest of the way home. Before turning the car off was getting the normal idle sputtering I was getting before.  So where I'm at now, entire ignition system has been replaced with upgraded components. Plugs still gapped at .8mm. Removed the fuel cap in case it was building too much reverse pressure I'm the tank, didn't help at all. Now I'm still on the same tank of gas the fuel treatment was in, I'm thinking if I can run that out and then refill with fresh 93 maybe  the treatment is too concentrated in some areas but doesn't explain that it only does it once the car is warm. I'm leaning towards fuel pump or injectors but if the injector was clogging I don't think it would make it shut off like it has but then fire right back up like nothing happened. So my current guess would be the pump. Without a fuel pressure guage no way to test or check it while it's running.  So that's kind of where I'm at. Need to start testing fuel components and ecu/wiring but I'm at a loss of what's the next logical step and procedure for testing it. 
    • @niZmO_Man thanks for that info, lucky I bought the gktech ones 🤙.
×
×
  • Create New...