Jump to content
SAU Community

Group Buy: Am Performance M35 Intake


bigkevracer
 Share

Recommended Posts

Due to the interest in the AM Performance intake pipe, I've spoken to Andrew and we're now going to do a group buy.

You can see pictures of the intake pipe in the original thread: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/414739-m35-am-performance-intake/

Build quality and workmanship is top notch. These really are impressive bits of gear.

They will bolt up to the stock turbo and stock airbox, or you can run a pod filter.

AM Performance now sell these online for $480. If we get 5 people, group buy price will be $400.

Delivery will be $20 Australia wide, $50 world wide, and will take 7-10 days.

Group buy will close Monday 17 December or when we have 5 people. I'd rather close early so we can get these sorted before Christmas.

This is a great price for a great product that I'll be dyno testing on Tuesday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

lolz.....at Dyno results!

Just add it $100 for every extra KW you get Ryan!

.....like most of them would know what they were looking at anyway. :P

So lets do this properly

So Ryan.

$1,500 - $2,000 for engine dyno hire(including jig)

$120 for oil change

$1,800 for motor in and out

$500 for engine wear and tear

$400 for every day Ryan is without his car

Add that to the frigg'n price.

PS. Roller dyno can be fudged!

New price for Suction pipe....$800 to cover cost of proper dyno results!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol something like that Craig...

There won't be a 100% accurate figure for what you can gain with the intake. My tune is adding the F-con in, upping the boost and . So when I beat the 166kW I got last time, and hopefully get around what Theo got with his F-con (~210kW), I can't exactly say "Intake pipe gives you a 44kW power increase", because it's a flat out lie.

The intake pipe removes a restriction in the intake and flows better than stock. I think Scotty and Cam found that the intake pipe was required for over 250kW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

180kw lol.

thats where the stock suction stopped scott if im not mistaken.. but again, thats in the day when the dyno was in a different calibration.

hmm, I though it was just on 200 that the intake maxed out. Now that I think of it, all irrelevant as the dyno correction was changed 3 or 4 times along the way :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hmm, I though it was just on 200 that the intake maxed out. Now that I think of it, all irrelevant as the dyno correction was changed 3 or 4 times along the way :wacko:

It was either that or the dump, maybe 180 was the dump.. But yeh. Cal has been done plenty times over at his dyno lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So this intake will max out the injectors on most cars with an exhaust and intercooler and standard ecu? I am guessing that it only maxes out the injectors at WOT? WHat does the intake do through the low and mid range of the engine, is there an improvement there or is really only for top end gains? I suppose I'm asking guys who have already done it, what has your experience been notwithstanding you have someone elses intake pipe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its a little more responsive, a little louder with the stock ecu..

the gains are only really had from the tune itself. you will hit AFM cut in most cases, especially with scotts one, as its 3" minimum up to the turb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its a little more responsive, a little louder with the stock ecu..

the gains are only really had from the tune itself. you will hit AFM cut in most cases, especially with scotts one, as its 3" minimum up to the turb.

There's no point in going 3" to the stock turbo though, as it only has a 2.5" intake on the front of it. It's TINY! With this design if you go high flow later on you can just get the bottom section modified for the larger turbo intake. Top is all 3" though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You got 166awkw stock? Farrrrk....

lol. Wasn't stock. That was after full exhaust, AM Performance dump pipe, mid pipe with highflow cat and cat back. Only other mod was a Blitz panel.

Thats why I'd always suggest your first mod should be exhaust. Crazy gains to be had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no point in going 3" to the stock turbo though, as it only has a 2.5" intake on the front of it. It's TINY! With this design if you go high flow later on you can just get the bottom section modified for the larger turbo intake. Top is all 3" though.

Yeh, obviously the 3" is making a difference with the 2.5" though if ones flowing enough to hit AFM cut with the stock turbo, and ones not.

I was just comparing to Scotty's one with the 3" all the way is all, it's the annoying problem I ran into lol

If this one avoids that, will be a good option for some of the mild modders here!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no point in going 3" to the stock turbo though, as it only has a 2.5" intake on the front of it. It's TINY! With this design if you go high flow later on you can just get the bottom section modified for the larger turbo intake. Top is all 3" though.

Of course there is a reason to keep it 3 inch to the turbo mouth, less restriction... I match my intakes to the actual hole made by the lathe (every highflow is different) in the front housing, and then tapering it out like a Garrett, a nice smooth funnel into the turbo. At the speed of sound, the airflow needs every little bit of help it can.

That said, how many of you are looking for every KW available? I should have done the same thing myself and compromised the lower intake for the benefit of lower cost, easy fitment and jigging, but as you would all know by now, I try and design my products for the best flow possible.

Hopefully Andrew does well with these, they haven't been a big seller for me over the years. Jump on the group buy guys. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
    • Yes that sounds right. Cars currently in the shop for the engine work. Will need to remeasure .. but yes I think I must be targeting 45cm from fender. 
×
×
  • Create New...