Jump to content
SAU Community

V35 Std Brakes Non Brembo


Recommended Posts

I am thinking that I may have to replace my front discs sometime in the near future as theres a fair difference in height/thickness of the disc from where the pad wares on the disc to the small area on the edge of the disc that the pad dosent touch.

Was wondering if its the same setup as the 350z non brembo for pads and discs? and if anyone knows what the min safe thickness is

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should be.

I have Z33 non-brembo pads in my M35 and they fit perfectly.

Considering that the Brembo package is the same between the Z33 and V35 (also a bolt on for my M35), I would imagine that the non-brembo would be the same and fit all three models.

Edited by iamhe77
Link to comment
Share on other sites

same setup

I sold quite a few rotors and pads for early V35 coupe and they're basically early 350Z rotors and pads...

The late model update is a bit tricky at the rear 308mm, V35 coupe 2005~ has rear park brake of around 170mm but a late 350Z has rear park brake around 190mm - so fitting a rear 350Z late model rotors will render the park brake useless.

No issue for early V35 / 350Z either non-brembo or brembo....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can definitely say that for a series 2 V35 std brakes are NOT the same as 350z.

A couple of years back i had pretty much one of the first series 2's and went to a place to have them changed thinking they were the same but when i got there, quite different.

The V35 pads are much larger than the 350Z non brembo's. Not sure about disc size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the pads should be the same, just the rotor size different?

Rotor Sizes:

V35 early 2001-2004

Front 296mm Rear 292mm (same as 350Z early)

V35 track 2003-2004

Front 324mm Rear 322mm (same as 350Z track)

V35 late 2005-2008

Front 320mm Rear 308mm (Front is same as 350Z late 17" EXCEPT rear rotor inner diameter)

Pads:

V35 early 2001-2004

Front DP2775 or DP21636 Rear DP21666

V35 track 2003-2004

Front DP21644 Rear DP21537

V35 late 2005-2008

Front DP2775 or DP21636 Rear DP21666

DP2775 and DP21636 have very similar shape and interchangeable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Did anyone end up solving this issue ? I have sane problem right now please help.. im sick of rda denying that their database is incorrect. I have v35 2005 6mt coupe series 2 .... I need correct rear rotor... inmer diameter is provlem right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:) I feel your pain.. I have had the same problem with brake suppliers refusing to accept their catalogues are wrong regardless of how much evidence you give them.

Just about all local brake suppliers will tell you that all V35 non brembo brakes are the same.. This is WRONG!

The listings they have are for Series 1 brakes only!

After researching this quite a bit in the past, this is what I came up with -

early non-brembo 350z (pre 05) and Series 1 V35 front and rear brakes are the same (296mm front rotors, 292mm rear rotors, single piston front and single piston rear callipers).

05+ non-brembo 350z and Series2/3 V35 front and rear brakes are the same (320mm front rotors, 308mm rear rotors, twin piston front and single piston rear callipers)

Not too sure about the brembos, but I wouldn't be surprised if they are the same.

Rear pads are the same across all.

Front Pads are different.

As for the handbrake, I researched this a little and couldn't find anything to suggest the 05+ 350z rear rotors have a 190mm handbrake, all the resources I found said it was a 170mm just like the V35. However, I did find the Brembo rears have a 190mm handbrake.

However, some have claimed the have seen non-brembo 350z rear rotors with a 190mm handbrake, so I am not to sure of this.

As for real life experience, I have a 05+ 350Z rear rotor on my S2 V35 and it fits perfect, same size handbrake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Vanos solenoid problems and basically all sensors die an early death 
    • Yep, back in the day when you could pick up a Stagea RB25 NEO for $1,500 it was worth it. These days... just chuck your V8 or B58 in.
    • from my limited BMW experience: - they burn oil WTF (B48 FTW 170kW engine) - dump oil every 5,000km and you'll be ok.. until it drops a bearing and rebuild time. replace engine with B58
    • I would avoid the AWD motor in a RWD using a modified RWD sump and pickup. The way the pick up is positioned, you'll have oil pick up issues on hard acceleration on a track around bends. Even with a baffled, gated sump. I suppose if you don't race on a track and it's used for straight line activities or street use you might be ok.
    • They absolutely are, but the thing is, if you're only exposed to these circuits for a while, what I normally think is good driving suddenly isn't so much. I was a pussy at the Nurburgring (GP) entering corners at 180kph - the difference in the balance of the car suddenly becomes so much more pronounced and I'm still a bit regarded at left-foot braking - something I now practice on my commute. So the (dream) plan with the E90 is to make it a 325i Cup car. Whether I get there or not is another matter. In my mind the simplicity of having the NA variant and cost made it a bit more appealing. Plus, like mentioned above, I'm actually too much of a pussy for big power. Of course I f**ked up by not researching enough on the N53 vs N52, the latter being more robust without the DI system.  Suspension-wise on the BMW, and I've been reading the technical requirements for the 325i cup, basically everything except struts has to be standard - bushes are free. I figure you get about 5-10mm adjustment with the rear camber bolts which should translate to 0.5- 1.5 degrees of adjustment. So with coilovers, lowered at 30/40mm I expect I can dial out some of the camber from a drop and attain -1.5 to -2. If necessary, I could get the same effect as the M3 arms with some offset bushes. There is a limitation on ARB width to qualify, although I absolutely want to get either M3 ARBs (can't say sway incase I upset GTSBoy) or the H&R ones - both of these are the cheapest options. Like mentioned, M3 arms are on the way and I should have them fitted within the next week. How are the BC Racing coilovers btw? Reviews are mixed but I think for me they would be fine; a friend of mine uses them on his R34 for track driving and has nothing bad to say. I'm looking at these or the ST coilovers (German brand, new to me) as prescriped the in Cup spec sheet. They're both similarly priced and offer camber adjustment. It's fine but it really upsets my OCD. I've got a couple of options for dialing out the rear camber and keeping my ill-fitting wheels: raise the rear a little bit, say 5mm, that should permit -2.5 camber or drop the front to restore that slight bias of more negative camber up front (not optimal with the roads here). The next alignment won't be until at least next year and I really need to rebuild the rear subframe. For now, I'm not using it at all on the streets except occasional blasts through the German countryside. I was covering about 10k kms p/year in Japan, I expect this to now be about 3-4k. You could say buy better sized wheels, and yes, I should have. But the wheels came from the Z and price of good wheels is just insane now. Again, a couple of options: get a new set (I want 17" RPF1s) or buy two used 9.5J TEs, both are about the same price excluding shipping. 
×
×
  • Create New...