Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

Nothing wrong with the GTR, it belongs to a member on this forum.

32 GTR had hks hard pipe kit, 100mil jap cooler, dump back HKS system, fuel pump, mines ecu, and from memory 268atw.

My E4 had an axle back exhaust and pushed 188atw with a failing fuel pump. As stated in this state it was 0-100 in under 5s and 0-200 in 13s. The evo would match the GTR at 70kph in 1st gear, then top out 2nd just over 90 when the GTR would catch it as the GTR would hang onto 2nd until close to 120. By that time I was running out of torque in high end 3rd gear and the GTR would walk away from 140+.

GTR stock weight is like 1550? My E4 hit the weighbridge at 1300.

Evo 9s are 1450, having driven one with an Evo green at a failing 240kw, I can say it is significantly faster than the said GTR even in its current spec of over 300atw using HKS 2510s. Owner has driven the E9 and confirmed the same. That E9 also had no spool problems and would easily overpower what I had prior (all with the capability of 300atw on E85 from the green turbo - td06sl2 20g).

To me that is a lot different to the way I read your first statement. This makes a lot more sense.

So you are saying the Evo4 was EVEN with the GTR in 1st gear, then the Evo4 got ahead for a short time when the GTR caught back up and passed it from then on.

Even a small difference in weight can make a big difference in acceleration there is no denying that. I used to have a turbocharged commodore weighing in at only 1300kg and even with a moderate power figure of 225rwkw it was even with many 300rwkw cammed LS1's that would have weighed an extra 200kgs or more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing wrong with the GTR, it belongs to a member on this forum.

32 GTR had hks hard pipe kit, 100mil jap cooler, dump back HKS system, fuel pump, mines ecu, and from memory 268atw.

My E4 had an axle back exhaust and pushed 188atw with a failing fuel pump. As stated in this state it was 0-100 in under 5s and 0-200 in 13s. The evo would match the GTR at 70kph in 1st gear, then top out 2nd just over 90 when the GTR would catch it as the GTR would hang onto 2nd until close to 120. By that time I was running out of torque in high end 3rd gear and the GTR would walk away from 140+.

GTR stock weight is like 1550? My E4 hit the weighbridge at 1300.

Evo 9s are 1450, having driven one with an Evo green at a failing 240kw, I can say it is significantly faster than the said GTR even in its current spec of over 300atw using HKS 2510s. Owner has driven the E9 and confirmed the same. That E9 also had no spool problems and would easily overpower what I had prior (all with the capability of 300atw on E85 from the green turbo - td06sl2 20g).

Evo X does 0-200km/hr in 23sec, a Evo VI does it in 21sec, but a Evo IV with a cat back can do it in 13sec?!?

LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EVOS are not that light either, I know that the Evo 7 and up are more than 1400kg, which is equal to or more than a R33/34 GTS-t or GT-T

My searching says Evo 7 curb weight is 1,320–1,400 kg.

The difference in 0-100 between an Evo and a GTST or GTT would be traction on launch.

The above example is a GTR versus an Evo, there is a decent weight difference between those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evo X does 0-200km/hr in 23sec, a Evo VI does it in 21sec, but a Evo IV with a cat back can do it in 13sec?!?

LOL

Everything didn't line up. If his car did that 200 speed, the gtr he spoke of is clearly faster if it walks away after 140km/h. If that is the case that gtr has a 0 to 200 almost as fast as veyron... But yeah back on topic.

Tao has there been any progress on the electric spoiling system? I've been thinking about it and this thing is going to affect the air flow meter setup. Maybe you will need two afm's. Or run a map sensor or create a ugly pipe with a u pipe coming out which holds the fan system in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any one's got a dyno sheet of a evo including torque curve? If there's a turbo that has similar or better downlow torque then a evo then there might be a chance of beating it.

Any way, ATR43G1 is in the test car now. Super responsive. Should give it a new name: DDT. Standing for Dose dynamic turbochargers (that came from Trent :laugh: ). instant boost, makes lots of sucking, splatering and dosing sound, kept the BOV very busy. expecting 230rwkws with stock or better response. will post result soon.

atr43g1front.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any one's got a dyno sheet of a evo including torque curve? If there's a turbo that has similar or better downlow torque then a evo then there might be a chance of beating it.

Any way, ATR43G1 is in the test car now. Super responsive. Should give it a new name: DDT. Standing for Dose dynamic turbochargers (that came from Trent :laugh: ). instant boost, makes lots of sucking, splatering and dosing sound, kept the BOV very busy. expecting 230rwkws with stock or better response. will post result soon.

video footage or it didn't happen!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

video footage or is didn't happen!!!

I have a gcg turbo that basically does this, highflowed BB rb20 turbo, it is very believable. 230kw isn't a huge torque increase over the stock turbo, they will make 200rwkw if you really lean on them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evo's Australia forums now.

EAU

Evo's are lighter. If we are gonna talk shit on skylines we should be saying silvia's are faster.... Which they are :rofl:

covering my ears now, lalalalalallaalal dont hear anything, mm skyline lalalalla

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a gcg turbo that basically does this, highflowed BB rb20 turbo, it is very believable. 230kw isn't a huge torque increase over the stock turbo, they will make 200rwkw if you really lean on them.

lol, wasn't saying it isn't believable. Just wanta hear it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey mate just out of curiosity what front swaybar do you run and do still use the factory end links if you don't mind sharing that info.
    • They will be (within normal range) and they won't be causing the misfiring.
    • Chinese parts can be good, it's all in the quality assurance, and materials, but, that costs more, but, typically not alot more, it is up to the customer who is getting the parts made, some are happy to pay more for quality good QA and materials because the savings are in the cheap labour costs, so they can sell a quality product at a lower price point, other customers who are getting parts made give no farks and want their products to be as cheap as possible for maximum profit, so minimal QA and average materials  Hence why some Chinese parts are crap, whilst other are good Much like parts and other stuff made in different countries around the world, including "made in Australia", "made in Japan", "made in 'Merica" branded gear
    • Agree with Bogan bloke above. I like running quality tyres on my street driven cars. Wife's daily as well as my daily have Michelin PS4, good tyre that does everything you'd expect without fuss and reasonably priced for popular sizes that aren't enormous. Skyline had Yokohama on it for many years but have recently fitted zestino tyres. Just did a quick Google and they're actually Chinese made (jap designed apparently). Surprisingly they grip really well, wet and dry and haven't died, YET. Obviously on the higher end of CCP tyres but still China nonetheless. 
    • My view is to put the best tyres your budget allows for a daily, there is no run off or kitty litter on the street, only cars, bikes, gutters, trees, kids .......as for the track, it's not like street driving where you need to deal with all the thousands of Muppets that are cutting you off, slamming on their brakes for animals or pedestrians that wander into the road Every mm the tyre brakes better could be the mm's required to not running over a kid who runs out in front of you, especially if it's wet, wet weather is where most cheap tyres fail horribly, either when hard braking, or quick evasive turning even at lower speeds My Honda came with Tracmax, whilst they worked in the dry doing legal road speeds, in the wet they were rubbish  After some googling reviews I tried some Hankook Ventus Prime 4's, the difference in the dry is noticeable, but in the wet the difference is chalk and cheese, IIRC they were around $150 a tyre fitted, so for only $600 for 4 news tyres, that are lasting really well, I have tyres that actually work at legal road speeds in the wet If they save me once from "an unfortunate situation" they have paid for themselves  Tyres are one of those things that can save your life when driving, and as most of your time driving is in your daily, your daily tyres are more important than a tyre on a performance car that knocks of a second or 2 on the track My daughter is a copper, she regularly drags dead or injured people out of cars because they lose control, or run up the back of cars in the wet TL;DR. Buy the best tyres that might help save your life if $hit goes down https://www.bitre.gov.au/publications/ongoing/road_deaths_australia_monthly_bulletins  
×
×
  • Create New...