Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

Posting a little update. This is the SS2 based ATR28 turbocharger with a even larger turbine. This particular one runs off ceramic roller bearings. Hopping to get 300rwkws+ with 20psi by 4000RPMs.

comp.JPG

turbine.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That housing is nearly all turbine lol Surely that cant have a good nozzle area? You must have lost heaps when machining it to suit the turbine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's fine. You just need another one of my patented unspacers.

.

.

.

.

.

.

But seriously.....what size turbo is that manifold designed to hold up? For it to place it so close to the cam cover is a bit, um, wrong.

Edited by GTSBoy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely a problem with the manifold. I would say the jig used to make it would likely be overused and out of shape.

There is nothing unusual about the size of an SS2, its definitely not going to be much larger than a GT30/35 based turbo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an ss2 low mounted on a 6boost manifold with no issues. Comp housing is a bit close to the engine mount bracket but no issues at all

That manifold is odd. If someone was going to run that sort of manifold with an ext wastegate an ss2 should not be an issue at all. Looks like youd need to have a stock turbo for that to work......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If its a 6boost then call or email kyle. Probably best to email him with some photos and give him your number. He might be able to give you an answer or organise an exchange of some sort

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That housing is nearly all turbine lol Surely that cant have a good nozzle area? You must have lost heaps when machining it to suit the turbine.

I think it make similar power as your GTX3071 hopefully with better response. If that works well I will enable VCT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it make similar power as your GTX3071 hopefully with better response. If that works well I will enable VCT.

Taking consideration that my SS1PU made 30kw less than your test car (at the time on p98 w/cams) before it was maxed out, I am going to apply the same reduction to my GTX. In the end my car pulled the MPH to support happier numbers so I believe that's fair.

Just putting that out there before we compare the results from the 2. My car is a complete back to back, I have only changed the manifold and turbo. Considering I went to T3 high mount I should have more lag than you.

We will compare results soon enough. I'm sure they will either drive sales for yourself or give you something new to strive for

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most gtx3071r I've seen on sr20 are slightly laggier than the old gt3071r

Gt3071r 20psi by 4000rpm

Gtx3071r 20psi by 4500rpm

Both highmount t3 .63ar

But while the gt3071r will struggle to make 300rwkw on pump98 the gtx3071r will make that quite easily on 20psi and a lot more with more boost and e85 330-350rwkw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My results on my car with the ss1.5 were almost the same but I was on e85 his was one pump

For 20psi boost I made 250rwkw and he made the same but on pump 98

With 5 psi more down low and taper up top he got 270rwkw but he has a aftermarket manifold and step 2 cams mine is std manifold and poncams

E85 usually gives a 20kw gain on the same boost level

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference would be the cams. I've compared mine with few that has Pon cams at Trents, The BC cams are making in average of 15kws more mid-top while the pon cams has 15kws more in mid-low with better response.

The GT3071 on my car hits 20psi by 4250rpms at 250rwkws, feels laggy down low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another update this is my latest ATR43SS2 turbocharger.Compare to the current one. Compressor inducer has been increased by 2mms, while the turbine inducer and exducer has been increased by 3mms. This particular one is expected to be maxed out at around 390rwkws on E85.

comp.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, of course there's something wrong with the suspension. It was like that when it came out of the factory. Nissan wanted it to ride at least 50mm higher than most of us. They wanted it to be comfortable enough that the press and user reviews didn't complain about fillings being knocked out of teeth. The marketing people wanted to be able to talk about their fantastic new 4WS system (even if it was a pointless exercise, ha! pointless! Do you see what I did there? no? oh well. too bad). There weren't any semi-slicks or semi-semi-slicks or 18" wheels. Laser pointers didn't exist, so you couldn't easily build a bump steer gauge. There wasn't any better technology for suspension bushes than squishy shit in a condom. The list goes on.
    • I personally recommend not messing with factory suspension until you can clearly identify something wrong. For example I think the R33 might need some way to adjust front camber because I feathered the edges of the tires much more than the center of the tread doing some figure 8s and slalom.
    • Did some baking today, managed to fit it all in the oven. Turned out pretty good. Hopefully it holds up well to a bit of tool abuse.  Popped a few pieces on to see what the colours will look like. Pretty happy with how it came up.  Now to wait for the rest of the stuff to rock up
    • A creative mounting location would be from the roof. We totally need to bring back ludicrous stereo designs from AutoSalon days...
    • don't do. Fricken typos. Make me look like the sheeple.
×
×
  • Create New...