Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

I think up 200rwkws @ 15psi is all good

The 8 additional psi for 8kws part is not normal. Is the car running a 3inch metal induction pipe? if so try again with exhaust dropped from the cat.

Also is VCT enabled with this SR?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do I embed photos?

Got my s14 tuned today with a hypergear ss1pu, bit of a disappointing result, but that's more to do with my setup unfortunately.

Photo speaks for itself, high boost, low power, choking for some reason, new exhaust coming.

IIRC results were: 188kw @ 14psi, 200kw @ 15psi, 203kw @ 18psi, 208kw @ 23psi

http://s702.photobucket.com/user/Joey92_4020/media/20131107_165404.jpg.html

Something here is very wrong. What did your tuner say about the issue?

It's reasonably proven now that the SS1PU on an SR is within the realms of a responsive turbo, and will make 240 without breaking a sweat.

Yours is both laggy and failing to get anywhere near the power. If you go back to page 1 you will be able to find my dyno sheet in the reference list, mine is an SS1PU on an SR with NO VCT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My exhaust is really mix and match, 2.75" china split dump, mild steel front pipe, stainless 3" from there to 2.5" muffler, back to 3" stainless with twin 3" tips. He said changing this to a straight 3" will really help. If the gains are shit after that, then to look at the cam timing.

It felt really responsive when I first put the turbo on last week, and that was with the ecu still tuned to big injectors and the 3071, definitely feels laggier since being tuned though.

It was determined that the VCT in this is not working, so I'm on the lookout for reasonably priced vct gears as well.

Comparing the graphs, this comes on a lot sooner than the 3071 60kph instead of 102, but full boost on this is at like 150, whereas the 3071 was 140.

The tuner is fairly reputable up here in Brisbane, but maybe I will try somewhere else after I change the exhaust.

While I'm here, is 3.5" exhaust setup going to be too big? Found a well priced stainless one secondhand, but not sure about the size...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My exhaust is really mix and match, 2.75" china split dump, mild steel front pipe, stainless 3" from there to 2.5" muffler, back to 3" stainless with twin 3" tips. He said changing this to a straight 3" will really help. If the gains are shit after that, then to look at the cam timing.

It felt really responsive when I first put the turbo on last week, and that was with the ecu still tuned to big injectors and the 3071, definitely feels laggier since being tuned though.

It was determined that the VCT in this is not working, so I'm on the lookout for reasonably priced vct gears as well.

Comparing the graphs, this comes on a lot sooner than the 3071 60kph instead of 102, but full boost on this is at like 150, whereas the 3071 was 140.

The tuner is fairly reputable up here in Brisbane, but maybe I will try somewhere else after I change the exhaust.

While I'm here, is 3.5" exhaust setup going to be too big? Found a well priced stainless one secondhand, but not sure about the size...

Also need check cat inside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe That SS1PU's result is a little low, might due to some parts of the setup. Refering to John's 21U's high flow result. It made 320rwkws on E85 with factory setup, same as what SS1PU made on a proper high mount with external gate. The new high flow should make similar power or higher power as the SS1PU. Which I will just have to work on a more responsive and more powerful version of it :D

Another result of a bolton version of SS2 sent in today. from a R34 Skyline using Pump 100 fuel.

Final figure of 293rwkws @ 17.5psi

power.jpg

And perfect internal gated boost control.

boost.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another result of a bolton version of SS2 sent in today. from a R34 Skyline using Pump 100 fuel.

Final figure of 293rwkws @ 17.5psi

That's a very good result, I assume it's a manual? Is it possible to get a list of supporting mods?

I know that the auto driveline wastes power but there's a 36 rwkw difference between this and my R34 auto (same boost), which seems like quite a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a very good result, I assume it's a manual? Is it possible to get a list of supporting mods?

I know that the auto driveline wastes power but there's a 36 rwkw difference between this and my R34 auto (same boost), which seems like quite a bit.

nope that sounds about right...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been looking at some setting on the alarms for the Q60 and what buttons do and so and also been looking for details on the alarm in my V37 which is a standard issue with the car. settings like window roll up and a few others seem to not work at all. i cant seem to find exact info on V37 alarms so Q60 is all i can really go off i have not tried 400Z alarm settings or info yet so that will be next. any one got like a sheet of info on the alarm system in the V37 as all my documents are in japanese but i thought the system would basically be like standard through similar models? 
    • I had a fuel smell coming from the drivers rear and pulled the tank out to inspect where it was coming from, turns out the breather hose from the tank to the filler neck was perished. I’m going to Japan next week and I’ll grab it while I’m there  pulled the oil tank apart and started cleaning this crap out of it, some brake cleaner and rags got it looking new again 
    • Hmm. Was quite a few years ago now. I think I bought from a crowd in the US called CDT Audio. The speaker is the HD-6. The HD-6CF would have been the better option (based on T-S parameters), but they were discontinued in 4 ohm at that point in time. The HD-6 is a better driver in almost every other way (than the CF) - just not as good in IB. They still do the HD-6. They might even have a more suitable (for IB) option here.https://www.cdtaudio.com/cdtnew22/products/components/woofers/midwoofers/midwoofers.htm But, here's the rub. I was working in the US a lot back then, so I got them delivered to my US office and then just brought them back to OZ myself. I don't know if they will ship to OZ, and it probably wouldn't be great cost-wise anyway. As to results. They're driven direct off the rear channels of my headunit, because the headunit can be setup to run the rears as subs. So, not a lot of power being fed there. Nevertheless, there's no shortage of volume - the sub levels don't need or want to be boosted at all. The bass is definitely not what you would call "tight". It is definitely a bit delayed compared to a proper sub. But, with the great front soundstage and really good 6.5" woofers in the front doors, I'm getting most of the bass detail from the front and the rear is really only to extend the bottom end a bit. Works for what I'm doing. I mean - until recently you couldn't really hold a conversation in my car due to the fuel pump, and for many years I had tyres so noisy (Kumho KU36 at <50 tread depth) that I had to drive with earplugs anyway!
    • curious to know what drivers you chose and the results? quik mafs, says two 6.5s should roughly equate somewhere between a single 8" or 10" driver. i agree that IB is definitely the way to go in most cars imo.
    • S13 and R32 rear suspension geometry is horrible once you lower it (which everyone does). The camber & toe out ramp is very aggressive, hence it's common for the S13 boys/girls to use a S14 or S15 subframe as the geometry is light years ahead. I'm sure the same can be done on R32s, but I don't know anyone that has done that.
×
×
  • Create New...