Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

:rofl:

f*kn lolwat????

. Since the car still use factory drain trans, for road use and city driving, it won't be too comfortable.

i reckon it'll be alright ...maybe not ideal but good enough... mines a little doughy around town but its all worth it when sink the boot into it :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst I agree with you Stao, if you make the assumption that the turbo is well matched (and you'd be the one to tell us how well matched the front and rear of this particular turbo is, given that we're talking about an SS2, not a 3076 here), then if you plot your operating point off the top end of the compressor map then you'd have to think that you were also pushing the turbine side too hard.

The real question here is whether that operating point on the 3076 map is equally as bad on the SS2 compressor.. Actually, it's not. I still agree with you. The real question is whether the SS2's turbine side is too small, but I thought I'd point out that we're looking at an orange map when we're talking about an apple compressor.

Fair point GTSboy

Would have been ideal to use a ss2 compressor map and I actually asked for the ss2 compressor map, but as there wasn't one Stao said to use the Gt3076 compressor map

You're a compressed apple.

Haha :w00t:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if using the 3076 comp map was Stao's idea then obviously he reckons the SS2 compressor will have at least a broadly similar map. Doesn't say anything about the turbine side, but that's life.

And that actually brings up an interesting point. To create a compressor map for a given wheel is a lot of work. There is a metric shit-ton of information in a compressor map. You have to run the compressor at a particular shaft speed and vary the restriction on the compressor outlet whilst measuring the flow going through it very accurately, measure the temperature change of the air and the shaft speed, then do some calculations on some of that data to get the efficiency, just so you can plot a single point on the map. You have to do a whole lot of this at different shaft speeds and restrictions to flesh out the map, then joint your dots up in the appropriate lines and "circles" to create the map. This is within the means of your Garretts and your Borg Warners, but it is probably outside the means of nearly every smaller turbo manufacturer. Just doing it for one compressor is a lot of work, but if you've got 10 or 15 compressors on your catalogue, setting out to map them all would be a daunting task.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if using the 3076 comp map was Stao's idea then obviously he reckons the SS2 compressor will have at least a broadly similar map. Doesn't say anything about the turbine side, but that's life.

A 90T 60mm GT30 turbine is a reasonable comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Us Vic guys even bring out the Cadbury favorites at these functions

I'll do this when you get rid of the Merc and get back into Jap cars :P

That's not gonna happen anytime soon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

......Ummmm, cant say I totally aggree with you there hypergear....

A compressor map is made up of the efficiency islands based on a range of factors... one being shaft speed!

As whilst I agree its probably not the most accurate way to tell, it is very evident that blah_blahs engine has already gone over the maximum "efficient" shaft speed of 145,000rpm...

What causes the shaft to rotate? The turbine wheel!

Another interesting fact I learnt today talking to the right people:

An inefficient engine will run a higher timing advance to allow the extra time required to burn the a/f....

The more efficient the engine the less timing it will require with no power loss...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you talking about flow or volume?

Volume can be measured the same way a chamber is checked...

But once you've been doing this for over 10years you start to get the hang of it...

Where as many people thrive to get perfect port volumes, the fact of the matter is there is a lot more other important things to consider, as a few cc difference in a port is not going to tarnish a whole engines performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im an odd type of guy...

Many years ago, back when we used flow benches, we were building a race engine, target power was just over 600hp....

Selected aftermarket heads for it, to which we copped a lot of criticism for as "they won't be big enough"

Done our port work to it, and got them flowed...

People litrally laughed at the results and mocked us...

Went ahead and bolted the heads on, and sent it to the engine dyno...

650hp...

So why would I choose to use a flow bench again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So that was one engine....how do you know you havent gone backwards with others, or if the port is really noisy and turbulent

I dont really care for flow bench results, was just intrested to see what your RB results were

so dont take what im saying as critisism merely intrested

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? So you can see how close you are to making the flow strip off the short turn. Or how about using a velocity probe to make sure you've got the cross sections right? Or see how well the flow is balanced around the periphery of the valve? Or seeing if the changes you make work better at low lift than high (or vice versa), or if you need to consider a different valve seat shape? etc etc etc.

Edited by GTSBoy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

bit off topic but I read an interesting way to make a home flow bench using an afm and a vacumn the other day...

I'm sure you can figure the rest out but I thought it was rather clever...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me ask this...

Do you even know what your talking about?

The fact that you are using big technical words only tells me you have no idea what you are talking about so you are just trying to confuse everyone...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been looking at some setting on the alarms for the Q60 and what buttons do and so and also been looking for details on the alarm in my V37 which is a standard issue with the car. settings like window roll up and a few others seem to not work at all. i cant seem to find exact info on V37 alarms so Q60 is all i can really go off i have not tried 400Z alarm settings or info yet so that will be next. any one got like a sheet of info on the alarm system in the V37 as all my documents are in japanese but i thought the system would basically be like standard through similar models? 
    • I had a fuel smell coming from the drivers rear and pulled the tank out to inspect where it was coming from, turns out the breather hose from the tank to the filler neck was perished. I’m going to Japan next week and I’ll grab it while I’m there  pulled the oil tank apart and started cleaning this crap out of it, some brake cleaner and rags got it looking new again 
    • Hmm. Was quite a few years ago now. I think I bought from a crowd in the US called CDT Audio. The speaker is the HD-6. The HD-6CF would have been the better option (based on T-S parameters), but they were discontinued in 4 ohm at that point in time. The HD-6 is a better driver in almost every other way (than the CF) - just not as good in IB. They still do the HD-6. They might even have a more suitable (for IB) option here.https://www.cdtaudio.com/cdtnew22/products/components/woofers/midwoofers/midwoofers.htm But, here's the rub. I was working in the US a lot back then, so I got them delivered to my US office and then just brought them back to OZ myself. I don't know if they will ship to OZ, and it probably wouldn't be great cost-wise anyway. As to results. They're driven direct off the rear channels of my headunit, because the headunit can be setup to run the rears as subs. So, not a lot of power being fed there. Nevertheless, there's no shortage of volume - the sub levels don't need or want to be boosted at all. The bass is definitely not what you would call "tight". It is definitely a bit delayed compared to a proper sub. But, with the great front soundstage and really good 6.5" woofers in the front doors, I'm getting most of the bass detail from the front and the rear is really only to extend the bottom end a bit. Works for what I'm doing. I mean - until recently you couldn't really hold a conversation in my car due to the fuel pump, and for many years I had tyres so noisy (Kumho KU36 at <50 tread depth) that I had to drive with earplugs anyway!
    • curious to know what drivers you chose and the results? quik mafs, says two 6.5s should roughly equate somewhere between a single 8" or 10" driver. i agree that IB is definitely the way to go in most cars imo.
    • S13 and R32 rear suspension geometry is horrible once you lower it (which everyone does). The camber & toe out ramp is very aggressive, hence it's common for the S13 boys/girls to use a S14 or S15 subframe as the geometry is light years ahead. I'm sure the same can be done on R32s, but I don't know anyone that has done that.
×
×
  • Create New...